mary_j_59: (mug)
[personal profile] mary_j_59
Ah, technobabble! You’re happily watching some science fiction show or movie, and some character comes out with a string of incomprehensible syllables. For example:

“Captain, the phase inverters have reached 2000 degrees kelvin. If we don’t reverse their polarities, they will implode!” (* Please note: I made up that example on the fly. I think it’s nonsense even for technobabble.)

“Huh?” you say to yourself. Then, if the writers have done their job, you’ll either say to yourself, “Oh, I see. Their engine is overheating, and they need coolant,” or else you’ll just ignore the technobabble and focus on the story. If, however, the writers have not done their job, you will get annoyed.

Of course, each reader, writer, and viewer has a different tolerance for technobabble, and a different idea of what might make it especially good, or especially bad. I’d guess that, for most of us, it’s usually especially bad. Can there be a way to write it well?

I think there might be. I’m going to preface this by saying I have no desire to feed the flames of the Star Trek versus Star Wars arguments. I like them both. To be absolutely accurate, I am a passionate Niner, love the original Trek, like Next Generation, and also like the first three Star Wars movies. It’s quite possible to love both Trek and Star Wars. It’s also quite possible to get annoyed by technobabble in both franchises!

That said, I think the original Trek did something very clever with dilithium. When I was a kid watching the reruns, I didn’t question dilithium very much, if at all. It was just a substance the Enterprise needed if it was to fly through space. As I’d learned in music, All Cars Eat Gas. All Starships Eat Dilithium. Cool!

The concept of dilithium works because:

1. We’re all familiar with the idea of fueling an engine.
2. Lithium actually exists, so it sounds as though dilithium might exist. After all, other highly reactive elements, such as hydrogen, have isotopes. So why not an isotope of lithium? It also makes sense that such a reactive metal would be rare in its pure form. (In fact, it is.)
3. Following on from the second point - though I didn’t know it when I first saw the show as a child, lithium’s a highly reactive metal, the first of the alkalis. You’d want something reactive to power a starship.
4. And finally, the show just mentions dilithium, mentions its scarcity and value, and lets it go at that. That’s the really smart thing here. Because, if you start explaining, things get more than a little quirky.

It seems the Enterprise runs on fusion, the same process that powers the sun. The primary fuel for fusion is hydrogen, not lithium, and people who dream of creating fusion reactors on earth expect to use seawater to make electricity. When you think about it, it’s easy to see why Starfleet engineers would prefer not to use seawater! Or, indeed, fresh water. It’s heavy and hard to store. If I were an engineer on a Starship, I wouldn’t want hundreds of gallons of water sloshing around my engine room!

So kudos to the Star Trek creators for coming up with a bit of technobabble that just does its job.

Back in the 1970’s, George Lucas did the same thing with the Force. Star Wars was basically a fairy tale set in outer space, with a princess, a farm boy, a black-clad villain, a wise mentor, and so forth. The Force made perfect sense as a power running throughout the universe that some people could access and use.


But then they went and wrecked it.


What, please, is the point of midi-chloridians? How are these fantasy mitochondria any better than the Force?

Again, the Trek writers were wise not to explain too much when they came up with warp drive and dilithium. Likewise, in Star Wars, the Force was doing its job just fine without any midi-chloridians to explain it away. So here’s a tip: if you have to write technobabble, keep it as simple and as real as you can. And don’t explain too much!

As for me, the idea of writing technobabble scares me. I don’t invent science; I try, as far as I’m able, to keep what little science I’ve put in my stories real. But I can enjoy good technobabble when I hear it, or read it. To me, dilithium is good technobabble. The Force is quite decent technobabble. The best technobabble I’ve ever read, though, is in Diane Duane’s Young Wizards. I just love reading her kids using the speech to cast spells!

How about you? Do you love technobabble, or hate it, or are you indifferent? Do you think it’s good to explain everything in a science fantasy, or are you willing to let some things go? And what do you think is the best technobabble you’ve read or watched?
From:
Anonymous( )Anonymous This account has disabled anonymous posting.
OpenID( )OpenID You can comment on this post while signed in with an account from many other sites, once you have confirmed your email address. Sign in using OpenID.
User
Account name:
Password:
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
Subject:
HTML doesn't work in the subject.

Message:

 
Notice: This account is set to log the IP addresses of everyone who comments.
Links will be displayed as unclickable URLs to help prevent spam.

Profile

mary_j_59: (Default)
mary_j_59

July 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
1617 18192021 22
232425262728 29
3031     

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 26th, 2017 07:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios