ext_172429 ([identity profile] hope-24.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] mary_j_59 2009-07-28 11:32 pm (UTC)

To be blunt, I just think that Rowling needed a very honest editor who would tell her when something was incoherent or illogical - and wouldn't hold back with the red pen. A great deal of the stuff I have problems with: the failure to follow through on the four element/balance thing of the four houses, Ginny the fembot, etc - would have been jumped on, ordinarily. I wonder whether the sheer success of the novels meant that critique became a no-no?

I think your idea is cleverer than what Rowling was probably going for. :)

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting