ext_75079 ([identity profile] mary-j-59.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] mary_j_59 2009-07-29 03:47 am (UTC)

I'm assuming you mean the anti-fantasy reading?

But the thing to realize is that all the other readings (including the naive, right-leaning pro-Gryffindor and Dumbledore one) are also present. And none of them - not even the shadow reading, and certainly not the pro-Gryffindor surface reading, hang together completely. No, the anti-fantasy one doesn't really hang together, either.

I don't expect any work of art to have a simple message one could write out on a teabag. But I do expect it to have coherence and an effect on the recipient; I expect it to communicate something. Rowling's work remains muddled to me. Furthermore, if she intended the anti-fantasy message, I don't like it. But I have to admit, if she intended that message, I can at last let go of the books because I can see where the author was coming from. I don't have to agree with her in order to understand her.

But I am not at all sure that she did intend this meaning. I wish I could be sure. It would be a huge relief to me if I could be sure that readers are not supposed to like Harry.

BTW, the pro-Gryffindor, pro-Dumbledore and Harry reading is essentially fascist.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting