Is Riddle a composite beast? If so, how? Are humans considered beasts as well? Or do they become beasts?
There's so much to cover when it comes to book seven. I don't think she'll be able to go through all the subplots in as much depth as we like plus deal with the main storyline. HBP had too much filler within it dealing with relationships and the like and OotP seemed also to consist primarily of filler. Filler being, in my definition, the points of Harry's life at school and his relationships and such rather than on the main plot of him versus Voldemort. There's nothing wrong will filler, mind you, but it does mean there are more questions to be answered come the end of book seven.
Personally, I do hope Snape is evil just because that would be the biggest rug pulled out on everyone. I've never come across someone before HBP who said that Snape was just pure evil and on Voldemort's side. Even after HBP, most people see him as good and on Dumbledore's side. It's that sort of confidence that bores me thoroughly and hope, purely for the sake of shaking up readers, that she won't turn him into a woobie.
As for Riddle, I can only hope she won't short-sight him, but I don't have much faith in that. I think she probably feels that she covered what she wanted to cover with him in HBP and, as stated on her website, she normally uses either Hermione or Dumbledore as her mouthpiece. So it's likely that she wants us to see him as the 'monster' she made him out to be and how Dumbledore also saw him.
no subject
There's so much to cover when it comes to book seven. I don't think she'll be able to go through all the subplots in as much depth as we like plus deal with the main storyline. HBP had too much filler within it dealing with relationships and the like and OotP seemed also to consist primarily of filler. Filler being, in my definition, the points of Harry's life at school and his relationships and such rather than on the main plot of him versus Voldemort. There's nothing wrong will filler, mind you, but it does mean there are more questions to be answered come the end of book seven.
Personally, I do hope Snape is evil just because that would be the biggest rug pulled out on everyone. I've never come across someone before HBP who said that Snape was just pure evil and on Voldemort's side. Even after HBP, most people see him as good and on Dumbledore's side. It's that sort of confidence that bores me thoroughly and hope, purely for the sake of shaking up readers, that she won't turn him into a woobie.
As for Riddle, I can only hope she won't short-sight him, but I don't have much faith in that. I think she probably feels that she covered what she wanted to cover with him in HBP and, as stated on her website, she normally uses either Hermione or Dumbledore as her mouthpiece. So it's likely that she wants us to see him as the 'monster' she made him out to be and how Dumbledore also saw him.