That was very tragic with Cedric (and I think the point was to make it as tragic as possible), but I don't see it in this case. Snape's actions won't have negative results. Obviously they have to have positive results for Draco/Harry/the world, as we will get a happy ending for the series. Snape himself probably sacrifices himself (through the killing of Dumbledore and his own death - probably) to redeem his evil past, but characters often have to sacrifice themselves for good.
Of course I don't think that Dumnbledore's death and maybe even the unbreakable vow were mistakes in the first place. I think Dumbledore was as good as dead since the thing with the ring happened (Snape only stole him a little time to put his affairs in order), and I think that he wanted and needed Snape to go under deep cover.
We'll see soon! I had to type it once more. This might be my last Snape debate before ... we probably have much more topics to debate! :)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2007-06-14 12:42 pm (UTC)Of course I don't think that Dumnbledore's death and maybe even the unbreakable vow were mistakes in the first place. I think Dumbledore was as good as dead since the thing with the ring happened (Snape only stole him a little time to put his affairs in order), and I think that he wanted and needed Snape to go under deep cover.
We'll see soon! I had to type it once more. This might be my last Snape debate before ... we probably have much more topics to debate! :)