Date: 2009-07-29 03:47 am (UTC)
I'm assuming you mean the anti-fantasy reading?

But the thing to realize is that all the other readings (including the naive, right-leaning pro-Gryffindor and Dumbledore one) are also present. And none of them - not even the shadow reading, and certainly not the pro-Gryffindor surface reading, hang together completely. No, the anti-fantasy one doesn't really hang together, either.

I don't expect any work of art to have a simple message one could write out on a teabag. But I do expect it to have coherence and an effect on the recipient; I expect it to communicate something. Rowling's work remains muddled to me. Furthermore, if she intended the anti-fantasy message, I don't like it. But I have to admit, if she intended that message, I can at last let go of the books because I can see where the author was coming from. I don't have to agree with her in order to understand her.

But I am not at all sure that she did intend this meaning. I wish I could be sure. It would be a huge relief to me if I could be sure that readers are not supposed to like Harry.

BTW, the pro-Gryffindor, pro-Dumbledore and Harry reading is essentially fascist.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

mary_j_59: (Default)
mary_j_59

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526 27282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 12th, 2025 04:04 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios