Date: 2009-07-29 02:25 pm (UTC)
Well - it didn't happen to me. Nothing at all that Rowling could do would get me to abandon Tolkien and LeGuin, for example! But I do think that, if Rowling had truly loved fantasy as a genre, she would have thought more about the world-building you mention and done it more carefully. I don't know that I would have liked her story any better if she had had clear rules of magic, though! I did spend some time questioning why I liked fantasy when I did not like magic, though, and I'm still reluctant to pick up any book that deals with witches, wizards and magical schools!

As for casual readers - I saw, in DH, a definite effort to diminish Snape, but most casual readers still saw him as a hero, if not the hero of the piece. Thus the child's question - did you always mean Snape to be a hero? - and Rowling's horrified gasp in reaction. So I suppose we should be grateful that she was not in perfect control of her material, after all! Snape got away from her, and Harry didn't.

(I should mention that I did thoroughly enjoy The Bartimaeus Trilogy. Stroud did a good, honest job on those books. On R. J. Anderson's recommendation, I also just finished The Demon's Lexicon . That, too, is a well-crafted book that tells a worthwhile (if creepy and disturbing) story. About Bartimaeus - a child told me that they were far better than Harry Potter. I did not believe him, but, on reading them, I discovered he was right. They are.)
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

mary_j_59: (Default)
mary_j_59

March 2024

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526 27282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 05:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios