![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
mary_j_59Hi, everyone! I've been thinking about this for a while, having been puzzled by people saying they loved revising more than writing first drafts, or vice versa. Then, thanks to Jon Gibbs, who linked to a post by Laura Resnick, I stumbled across Dean Smith's "Killing the Sacred Cows of Publishing". Interesting stuff! If you haven't seen it, I do recommend that you take a look. Mr. Smith's blog is here: http://www.deanwesleysmith.com/?page_id=860
Before I read his blog, I was a big believer in rewriting, even though I didn't seem to do much of it. Or rather, I did (and do), but I tended to revise as I wrote. Then I would read the whole story/essay/piece through to correct for language and coherence. Once in a rare while, I would have to do more - I'd have to tear something apart and put it together again. That was never much fun to me (memories of grad school!) and I couldn't understand LJ friends who raved about how fulfilling it was. ;)
Then, just recently, after thinking long and hard about my novel, I decided I would lose the secondary villain and give all his lines and actions to the primary villain. It wasn't a struggle at all. On the contrary, it was just as easy and pleasant as writing the first draft. And, once it was done, I found that I'd shifted the story in some very interesting ways. The stakes became much higher for my protagonist. It felt as though I'd given a kaleidoscope a very slight twist and watched a picture fall into place. Needless to say, that can only have helped the story.
So yes, I believe in revising! And I now see that it can be just as much fun as drafting. But that's the thing - true revision, to me, feels like exactly the same process as drafting. You are just going deeper into your story and making the truth of that story clearer. It doesn't feel any different from writing the first draft, because it's still all about discovery.
Which is what Mr. Smith means when he talks about writing from the creative mind, rather than the critical mind. If you read his posts carefully, you'll note that he's not saying you should never revise. He is saying that, when you revise, you must take care to do it from the creative mindset. I'd add that you must also take care to immerse yourself in the world of your story. Then just let the words flow, as you do when you're writing a first draft.
What you come up with might surprise you.
What do you think? Do you think you are in the same mindset when writing first drafts and revising, or do you need to think differently about these two parts of the writing process? Do you like one stage more than the other? If so, why?
Before I read his blog, I was a big believer in rewriting, even though I didn't seem to do much of it. Or rather, I did (and do), but I tended to revise as I wrote. Then I would read the whole story/essay/piece through to correct for language and coherence. Once in a rare while, I would have to do more - I'd have to tear something apart and put it together again. That was never much fun to me (memories of grad school!) and I couldn't understand LJ friends who raved about how fulfilling it was. ;)
Then, just recently, after thinking long and hard about my novel, I decided I would lose the secondary villain and give all his lines and actions to the primary villain. It wasn't a struggle at all. On the contrary, it was just as easy and pleasant as writing the first draft. And, once it was done, I found that I'd shifted the story in some very interesting ways. The stakes became much higher for my protagonist. It felt as though I'd given a kaleidoscope a very slight twist and watched a picture fall into place. Needless to say, that can only have helped the story.
So yes, I believe in revising! And I now see that it can be just as much fun as drafting. But that's the thing - true revision, to me, feels like exactly the same process as drafting. You are just going deeper into your story and making the truth of that story clearer. It doesn't feel any different from writing the first draft, because it's still all about discovery.
Which is what Mr. Smith means when he talks about writing from the creative mind, rather than the critical mind. If you read his posts carefully, you'll note that he's not saying you should never revise. He is saying that, when you revise, you must take care to do it from the creative mindset. I'd add that you must also take care to immerse yourself in the world of your story. Then just let the words flow, as you do when you're writing a first draft.
What you come up with might surprise you.
What do you think? Do you think you are in the same mindset when writing first drafts and revising, or do you need to think differently about these two parts of the writing process? Do you like one stage more than the other? If so, why?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2011-08-22 08:10 am (UTC)One thing I like about Dean Wesley Smith is that he says to take even his ideas with thought, and not to just simply adopt them. I like trying new things, so I'll try it out and see how it works. If I'm better off revising, I'll return to it.
no subject
Date: 2011-08-26 07:34 pm (UTC)Another thing that rings true to me in what he says is to redraft, rather than to revise. Cynthia Leitich Smith does the same thing - and I stumbled on this process without even knowing it was a process. But, if you're stuck on something and don't know how to fix it, it can really help to put it aside, move on to something else, and then come back to it and rewrite without looking at the earlier draft.